Somewhere
there is a person who is spending between 22 and 24 hours in a ten foot by
seven foot room with next to no contact with any other people. Most people
would consider this to be torture and a violation of human rights. These are
the conditions that many prisoners live in, in prisons across the United
States, and yet the use of solitary confinement is deemed legal, and even
necessary. However, it isn’t very difficult to see that this policy violates
the 8th amendment of the Constitution, which prevents the use of
cruel and unusual punishment.
The main excuse used in support of the use of solitary
confinement is that it is being used to punish prisoners who are considered a
danger to others and themselves. It is said that solitary confinement is being
used to rehabilitate prisoners. However, multiple studies have said otherwise.
Juan Mendez, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on
torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment or punishment, decided
in August 2011 that “even 15 days in solitary confinement constitutes torture
or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and 15 days is the
limit after which irreversible harmful psychological effects can occur.” This
conclusion shows that the use of solitary confinement, even when used for a
short amount of time, can cause more harm than help. And there are prisoners
who have spent years, even decades, in solitary.
Senator John McCain has said, “It’s an awful
thing, solitary. It crushed your spirit and weakens your resistance more
effectively than any other form of mistreatment.” This was said by John McCain,
who had spent two years in confinement in a North Vietnamese cell, and he fared
better than most prisoners who have lived in solitary confinement. Most fall
into insanity, leading to self-mutilation and even suicide. Almost half of all
prison suicides are committed by prisoners in solitary confinement. This shows
that the use of solitary is more of a tool of torture than a tool of rehabilitation.
Additionally, there is the argument that solitary is used
as a form of punishment for prisoners who misbehave, and that prisoners who
spend longer amounts of time in a prison are there because they are considered
violent and a danger to themselves and others around them. This has also been
found to be potentially false, as a prison in Mississippi eliminated the use of
solitary confinement, and overall prison violence went down 50%. If this is so,
then there must be a better way to punish violent prisoners than to subject
them to torture?
Ultimately, it can easily be determined that solitary
confinement can be considered a cruel punishment; however, it is more difficult
to determine if it can be considered an unusual form of punishment. This is
more challenging.
The use of solitary confinement first showed up in the
early nineteenth century, with the United States being the leaders of the world
in the practice. However, the use of solitary was all but abandoned when the
negative effects of isolation quickly became apparent in the prisoners
behavior. However, in the recent past, the use of solitary has been taken up
again and is now being used in excess. It’s for this excess that it is
difficult to determine if it can be considered unusual.
No comments:
Post a Comment